Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSalinas Lozada, Julio Camilo
dc.contributor.authorMullo Rebolledo, Josué Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T18:23:27Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T18:23:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/17341
dc.descriptionThe development of swine production activities is closely linked to the productive and food sector. There are a number of nutritional alternatives on which the development of the implementation of different percentages of Cannabis Sativa meal in 10 commercial crossbred pigs was focused, which were evaluated depending on the percentage to be added to their diet, which were distributed as follows: Control Treatment, without inclusion of meal, Treatment 1 with inclusion of 2% of meal, Treatment 2 with addition of 3%, Treatment 3 with inclusion of 4% and corresponding to treatment 5 with addition of 5% of cannabis meal. In the evaluative development of the process of inclusion of cannabis meal, it was determined that when evaluating multiple variables in which the live weight gain was influenced with a higher weight due to the inclusion of treatment 2 with inclusion of 3% with weights of 68.35 kg, followed by the evaluation of the variable of consumption, it is shown that the treatment that consumed more feed was treatment 4 with a consumption of 244.63 kg, corresponding to the variable of feed conversion is attributed to Treatment 4 presented a higher feed conversion of 23.64 kg. Regarding the evaluation of the benefit-cost variable, treatment 2 presented a higher benefit-cost ratio of 3.10 percent.es_ES
dc.descriptionThe development of swine production activities is closely linked to the productive and food sector. There are a number of nutritional alternatives on which the development of the implementation of different percentages of Cannabis Sativa meal in 10 commercial crossbred pigs was focused, which were evaluated depending on the percentage to be added to their diet, which were distributed as follows: Control Treatment, without inclusion of meal, Treatment 1 with inclusion of 2% of meal, Treatment 2 with addition of 3%, Treatment 3 with inclusion of 4% and corresponding to treatment 5 with addition of 5% of cannabis meal. In the evaluative development of the process of inclusion of cannabis meal, it was determined that when evaluating multiple variables in which the live weight gain was influenced with a higher weight due to the inclusion of treatment 2 with inclusion of 3% with weights of 68.35 kg, followed by the evaluation of the variable of consumption, it is shown that the treatment that consumed more feed was treatment 4 with a consumption of 244.63 kg, corresponding to the variable of feed conversion is attributed to Treatment 4 presented a higher feed conversion of 23.64 kg. Regarding the evaluation of the benefit-cost variable, treatment 2 presented a higher benefit-cost ratio of 3.10 percent.es_ES
dc.description.abstractEl desarrollo de actividades de producción de porcina se ve estrechamente ligada al sector productivo y a su vez alimenticio. Existen sin número de alternativas nutricionales en las cuales se centró el desarrollo de implementación de diferentes porcentajes de harina de Cannabis Sativa en 10 cerdos de cruce comercial los cuales fueron evaluados en dependencia del porcentaje a adicionar en su dieta los cuales fueron distribuidos: Tratamiento Testigo, sin inclusión de harina, Tratamiento 1 con inclusión del 2% de harina, Tratamiento 2 con adición del 3%, Tratamiento 3 con inclusión del 4% y correspondiente al tratamiento 5 con adición del 5% de harina de cannabis. En el desarrollo evaluativo del proceso de inclusión de harina de cannabis se determinó que al evaluar múltiples variables en las cuales la Ganancia de peso vivo se influenció con un mayor peso debido a la inclusión del tratamiento 2 con inclusión del 3% con pesos de 68,35 kg, seguido de la evaluación de la variable del consumo se manifiesta que el tratamiento que consumió mas alimento fue el tratamiento 4 con un consumo de 244,63 kg, correspondiente a la variable de conversión alimenticia se atribuye al Tratamiento 4 presentó una mayor conversión alimenticia de 23,64 kg. En cuestión a la evaluación de la variable beneficio costo el tratamiento 2 que presentó una mayor relación entre el beneficio y costo establecido en porcentaje de 3,10.es_ES
dc.format.extent85es_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherBABAHOYO: UTB, 2024es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/*
dc.subjectCannabis Sativaes_ES
dc.subjectCerdoses_ES
dc.subjectProducciónes_ES
dc.subjectInclusiónes_ES
dc.titleInclusión de cannabis (Cannabis Sativa) en la alimentación de cerdos de cruce comercial en la etapa de crecimiento y acabadoes_ES
dc.typebachelorThesises_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador