Análisis comparativo de la inmunocastración (GnRF) y castración quirúrgica en el rendimiento productivo en cerdos de engorde
| dc.contributor.advisor | Torres Moran, Diana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Viscarra Vásconez, Joel Alexander | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-27T16:22:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-27T16:22:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/9373 | |
| dc.description | This investigative work was carried out in a documentary way; With the aim of Analyzing the effect of immunocastration (GnRF) and surgical castration on the productive performance of fattening pigs: The research had the character of a bibliographic documentary; It was developed using scientific research methods such as inductive deductive. It was carried out by reviewing, analyzing and reflecting on several scientific articles published mainly on the web; also, in books that talk about this topic. Most of them were investigated on the internet. The time that this collection of bibliographic information lasted was three months; from February to April 2021. With the information contained in this document, it is sustained that the effects of immunocastration and surgical castration, two procedures that are currently used have their benefits; They also have their own characteristics. Surgical castration demands a low cost, because it requires supplies to prevent infection, produces stress and pain in the pig; and immunocastration, does not produce pain or stress, but it is necessary to assume a higher cost, which represents the two doses of vaccines, and who applies them, implies waiting for the weight and the reasonable age of the pig for vaccination, which generally does not match in second-rate pigs. It is concluded that they are important procedures that can be used to improve the quality of the meat and eliminate the sexual smell, leaving it suitable for consumption. | es_ES |
| dc.description | This investigative work was carried out in a documentary way; With the aim of Analyzing the effect of immunocastration (GnRF) and surgical castration on the productive performance of fattening pigs: The research had the character of a bibliographic documentary; It was developed using scientific research methods such as inductive deductive. It was carried out by reviewing, analyzing and reflecting on several scientific articles published mainly on the web; also, in books that talk about this topic. Most of them were investigated on the internet. The time that this collection of bibliographic information lasted was three months; from February to April 2021. With the information contained in this document, it is sustained that the effects of immunocastration and surgical castration, two procedures that are currently used have their benefits; They also have their own characteristics. Surgical castration demands a low cost, because it requires supplies to prevent infection, produces stress and pain in the pig; and immunocastration, does not produce pain or stress, but it is necessary to assume a higher cost, which represents the two doses of vaccines, and who applies them, implies waiting for the weight and the reasonable age of the pig for vaccination, which generally does not match in second-rate pigs. It is concluded that they are important procedures that can be used to improve the quality of the meat and eliminate the sexual smell, leaving it suitable for consumption. | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | Este trabajo investigativo, se realizó de manera documental; con el objetivo de Analizar el efecto de la inmunocastración (GnRF) y la castración quirúrgica en el rendimiento productivo en cerdos de engorde: La investigación tuvo el carácter de documental bibliográfica; se desarrolló empleando los métodos de investigación científica como el inductivo deductivo. Se ejecutó mediante la revisión, análisis y reflexión de varios artículos científicos publicados principalmente en la web; también en libros que hablan sobre este tema. La mayor parte de ellos fueron investigados en el internet. El tiempo que duró este levantamiento de información bibliográfica fue de tres meses; desde el mes de febrero hasta el mes de abril de 2021. Con la información que contiene este documento, se sustenta que los efectos de la inmunocastración y la castración quirúrgica, dos procedimientos que se emplean actualmente tienen sus beneficios; que también tienen sus propias características. La castración quirúrgica, demanda un bajo costo, porque requiere insumos para prevenir la infección, produce estrés y dolor en el cerdo; y la inmunocastración, no produce dolor, ni estrés, pero se requiere de asumir un costo más alto, que representa las dos dosis de vacunas, y de quien las aplica, implica esperar el peso y la edad prudencial del cerdo para su vacunación, que generalmente no coincide en los cerdos de segunda. Se concluye que son procedimientos importantes que pueden ser empleados para mejorar la calidad de la carne y eliminar el olor sexual, dejando apta para el consumo. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 20 p. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | es | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | BABAHOYO: UTB, 2021 | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/ | * |
| dc.subject | Inmunocastración | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Castración | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Rendimiento productivo | es_ES |
| dc.title | Análisis comparativo de la inmunocastración (GnRF) y castración quirúrgica en el rendimiento productivo en cerdos de engorde | es_ES |
| dc.type | bachelorThesis | es_ES |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador