Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMendoza Hidalgo, Edwin Amado
dc.contributor.authorGuanoluisa Suarez, Aracely Alexandra
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-25T15:09:06Z
dc.date.available2025-04-25T15:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/17897
dc.descriptionThe pressures exerted by animals through grazing is an aggravating factor since soil compaction is formed, causing plants to lose their normal state of growth both externally and internally, preventing the expansion of roots, water flow and porosity are also some of the causes that come from compaction. Compaction reduces soil yield because of the deterioration of physical, chemical and biological properties. Soil susceptibility varies according to texture, with clay soils being more vulnerable than sandy soils. In the present work, it is desired to demonstrate statistically if the soil of the FACIAG cattle ranch has an adequate degree of compaction so that the pastures are adequate to guarantee good quality pastures to be consumed by the cattle in a successful way. In this work we want to demonstrate statistically if the soil of the FACIAG livestock farm has an appropriate degree of compaction so that the pastures are adequate to ensure good quality pastures to be consumed by livestock successfully. A completely randomized design method (CRD) was used, in the field work was carried out by collecting samples of the different depths once this was finished we proceeded to take them to the laboratory to process the samples and thus we could obtain the results with a real density of the different depths with a coefficient of variation of 4.68% resulting that the best treatment was obtained at a depth of 10 cm with a 2.7 g/cm³; a bulk density of the different depths with a coefficient of variation of 4.29% with a depth of 10 cm was obtained 1.23 g/cm³ ; porosity with a coefficient of variation of 4.84% showed that the most suitable was the 30 cm with 55.19%; gravimetric moisture with a coefficient of variation of 8.23% it was determined that the sample at 20 cm was more suitable with 7.75%; Volumetric moisture with a coefficient of variation of 9.93% highlighted that the best treatment was 20 cm with 20.57% and the percentage of compaction of the different depths with a coefficient of variation of 5.86% resulted in the treatment at 10 cm being the most suitable with a compaction of 46%.es_ES
dc.descriptionThe pressures exerted by animals through grazing is an aggravating factor since soil compaction is formed, causing plants to lose their normal state of growth both externally and internally, preventing the expansion of roots, water flow and porosity are also some of the causes that come from compaction. Compaction reduces soil yield because of the deterioration of physical, chemical and biological properties. Soil susceptibility varies according to texture, with clay soils being more vulnerable than sandy soils. In the present work, it is desired to demonstrate statistically if the soil of the FACIAG cattle ranch has an adequate degree of compaction so that the pastures are adequate to guarantee good quality pastures to be consumed by the cattle in a successful way. In this work we want to demonstrate statistically if the soil of the FACIAG livestock farm has an appropriate degree of compaction so that the pastures are adequate to ensure good quality pastures to be consumed by livestock successfully. A completely randomized design method (CRD) was used, in the field work was carried out by collecting samples of the different depths once this was finished we proceeded to take them to the laboratory to process the samples and thus we could obtain the results with a real density of the different depths with a coefficient of variation of 4.68% resulting that the best treatment was obtained at a depth of 10 cm with a 2.7 g/cm³; a bulk density of the different depths with a coefficient of variation of 4.29% with a depth of 10 cm was obtained 1.23 g/cm³ ; porosity with a coefficient of variation of 4.84% showed that the most suitable was the 30 cm with 55.19%; gravimetric moisture with a coefficient of variation of 8.23% it was determined that the sample at 20 cm was more suitable with 7.75%; Volumetric moisture with a coefficient of variation of 9.93% highlighted that the best treatment was 20 cm with 20.57% and the percentage of compaction of the different depths with a coefficient of variation of 5.86% resulted in the treatment at 10 cm being the most suitable with a compaction of 46%.es_ES
dc.description.abstractLas presiones ejercidas por los animales mediante el pastoreo es un factor agravante ya que se forma una compactación del suelo dando como consecuencia que las plantas pierda su estado normal de crecimiento externamente como interno impidiendo la expansión las raíces, el flujo del agua y la porosidad también son unas de las causas que provienen de la compactación. La compactación reduce el rendimiento de los suelos ya que existe el deterioro de las propiedades físicas, la susceptibilidad de los suelos varia en cuanto a la textura, siendo los suelos arcillosos los más vulnerables que los arenosos. En el presente trabajo se desea demostrar estadísticamente si el suelo de la ganadería de la FACIAG cuenta con un grado de compactación apropiado para que las praderas sean adecuadas para garantizar unos pastizales de buena calidad para que sea consumido por el ganado de manera exitosa. Se utilizó un método de diseño completamente aleatorizados (DCA), en el trabajo de campo se realizó mediante la recolección de muestras de las distintas profundidades una vez terminado esto procedimos a llevarlas al laboratorio para procesar las muestras y así pudimos obtener los resultados con una densidad real de las diferentes profundidades con un coeficiente de variación de 4,68% dando como resultado que el mejor tratamiento fue el que se obtuvo a una profundidad de 10 cm con un 2,7 g/cm³; una densidad aparente de las diferentes profundidades con un coeficiente de variación de 4,29% con una profundidad de 10 cm se obtuvo 1,23 g/cm³ ; una porosidad con un coeficiente de variación de 4,84% se demostró que el más apto fue el de 30 cm con un 55,19%; humedad gravimétrica con un coeficiente de variación de 8,23% se determinó que a la muestra a 20 cm fue más adecuado con un 7,75% ; humedad volumétrica con un coeficiente de variación de 9,93% resalto que el mejor tratamiento fue el de 20 cm con un 20,57% y el porcentaje de compactación de las diferentes profundidades con un coeficiente de variación de 5,86% dio como resultado que el tratamiento a 10 cm es el más adecuado con una compactación de 46%.es_ES
dc.format.extent42 pes_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCompactaciónes_ES
dc.subjectForrajeses_ES
dc.subjectPorosidades_ES
dc.subjectErosiónes_ES
dc.subjectPropiedades Físicas.es_ES
dc.titleDeterminación del grado de compactación del suelo en área pastoril en la ganadería de la Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo.es_ES
dc.typebachelorThesises_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States