Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGómez Villalva, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorPérez Jacome, Jorge Fabricio
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T19:53:24Z
dc.date.available2023-11-08T19:53:24Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/15135
dc.descriptionCanine Pyoderma is defined as the presence of purulent material of bacterial origin on the skin. It is considered that there are around three types of Pyoderma; pseudopioderma, superficial pyoderma and deep pyoderma. It is estimated that it is the most common pathology in veterinary medical offices. Currently, ozone therapy is emerging as an alternative for the treatment of this dermatological problem. Samples were taken from 20 patients positive for canine Pyoderma, within which groups were separated; Group A and Group B, in group A, 22 mg/kg cephalexin plus ozone bath therapy was implemented as treat niment every 7 days for 14 days, while in group B, a conventional treatment based on 22 mg/kg cephalexin was used. every 12 hours for 14 days. After comparing the results in both groups, we can conclude that no statistically significant differences were found.es_ES
dc.descriptionCanine Pyoderma is defined as the presence of purulent material of bacterial origin on the skin. It is considered that there are around three types of Pyoderma; pseudopioderma, superficial pyoderma and deep pyoderma. It is estimated that it is the most common pathology in veterinary medical offices. Currently, ozone therapy is emerging as an alternative for the treatment of this dermatological problem. Samples were taken from 20 patients positive for canine Pyoderma, within which groups were separated; Group A and Group B, in group A, 22 mg/kg cephalexin plus ozone bath therapy was implemented as treat niment every 7 days for 14 days, while in group B, a conventional treatment based on 22 mg/kg cephalexin was used. every 12 hours for 14 days. After comparing the results in both groups, we can conclude that no statistically significant differences were found.es_ES
dc.description.abstractLa Pioderma canina se define como la presencia de material purulento de origen bacteriano en la piel, se considera que existen alrededor de tres tipos de Pioderma; pseudopioderma, Pioderma superficial y Pioderma profundo. Se estima que es la patología de mayor frecuencia en los consultorios medico veterinarios. En la actualidad la ozonoterapia nace como alternativa para el tratamiento de dicho problema dermatológico. Se realizó la toma de muestras en 20 pacientes positivos para Pioderma canino, dentro de los cuales se realizó la separación por grupos; Grupo A y Grupo B, en el grupo A se implementó como tratamiento cefalexina 22mg/kg más bañoterapia con ozono cada 7 días durante 14 días, mientras que en el grupo B se utilizó un tratamiento convencional a base de Cefalexina en dosis de 22mg/kg cada 12 horas durante 14 días. Posterior a la contrastación de resultados en ambos grupos podemos concluir que no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas.es_ES
dc.format.extent31 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherBABAHOYO: UTB, 2023es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/*
dc.subjectPioderma caninaes_ES
dc.subjectOzonoterapiaes_ES
dc.subjectBañoterapiaes_ES
dc.subjectDermatologíaes_ES
dc.titleComparación de ozonoterapia versus antibiótico como coadyuvante para Pioderma en perros en la ciudad Quevedoes_ES
dc.typebachelorThesises_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador