Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRojas Jorgge, Nessar
dc.contributor.authorSantana Suárez, Marcelo Joel
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-30T01:49:34Z
dc.date.available2022-04-30T01:49:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/11355
dc.descriptionThis bibliographic compilation details the different alternatives for the control of spittlebug (Mahanarva andigena), in the cultivation of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum). Among the alternatives are those of biological, cultural, etiological and chemical control, which influence the control of this pest that is the cause of economic losses to sugarcane growers. The conclusions determine that a relatively stable environment of sugarcane plantations can sometimes favor the establishment of natural control by native parasitoids and predators or biological control by introduced beneficial species; There are various agronomic practices that help prevent or minimize pest damage preventively, where an integrated pest management program will be successful if preventive control practices are included; Sugarcane cultivation is exposed to multiple and varied pest species, and more than one species may attack simultaneously. In turn, the development and application of rational control tactics tend to be specific, although there are several exceptions. In these circumstances, producers have broad-spectrum synthetic pesticides within their reach, however, the use of Metarhizium anisopliae is in a development phase, but there are good prospects for its use in management programs for this pest, especially during the rainy season. According to preliminary studies, a dose of 1 x 1013 conidia/ha is recommended, which is equivalent to 2 to 3 kg of rice-fungus/ha.es_ES
dc.descriptionThis bibliographic compilation details the different alternatives for the control of spittlebug (Mahanarva andigena), in the cultivation of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum). Among the alternatives are those of biological, cultural, etiological and chemical control, which influence the control of this pest that is the cause of economic losses to sugarcane growers. The conclusions determine that a relatively stable environment of sugarcane plantations can sometimes favor the establishment of natural control by native parasitoids and predators or biological control by introduced beneficial species; There are various agronomic practices that help prevent or minimize pest damage preventively, where an integrated pest management program will be successful if preventive control practices are included; Sugarcane cultivation is exposed to multiple and varied pest species, and more than one species may attack simultaneously. In turn, the development and application of rational control tactics tend to be specific, although there are several exceptions. In these circumstances, producers have broad-spectrum synthetic pesticides within their reach, however, the use of Metarhizium anisopliae is in a development phase, but there are good prospects for its use in management programs for this pest, especially during the rainy season. According to preliminary studies, a dose of 1 x 1013 conidia/ha is recommended, which is equivalent to 2 to 3 kg of rice-fungus/ha.es_ES
dc.description.abstractLa presente recopilación bibliográfica detalla las diferentes alternativas para el control del salivazo (Mahanarva andigena), en el cultivo de caña de azúcar (Saccharum officinarum). Entre las alternativas se presentan las de control biológico, cultural, etiológico y químico, mismas que influye sobre el control de esta plaga que es causante de pérdidas económicas a los cañicultores. Las conclusiones determinan que un ambiente relativamente estable de las plantaciones de caña de azúcar puede, algunas veces, favorecer el establecimiento del control natural por parasitoides y predadores nativos o el control biológico por especies benéficas introducidas; existen diversas prácticas agronómicas que ayudan a evitar o minimizar el daño de las plagas en forma preventiva, donde un programa de manejo integrado de plagas tendrá éxito si se incluyen prácticas preventivas de control; el cultivo de caña de azúcar está expuesto a múltiples y variadas especies de plagas, pudiendo ocurrir el ataque simultáneo de más de una especie. A su vez, el desarrollo y aplicación de tácticas racionales de control, tiende a ser específico, aunque existen variadas excepciones. En estas circunstancias, los productores tienen a su alcance plaguicidas sintéticos de amplio espectro, no obstante, el uso de Metarhizium anisopliae se encuentra en una fase de desarrollo, pero existen buenas perspectivas para su utilización en los programas de manejo de esta plaga, especialmente durante la época lluviosa. De acuerdo a estudios preliminares se recomienda una dosis de 1 x 1013 conidias/ha, lo que equivale de 2 a 3 Kg de arroz-hongo/ha.es_ES
dc.format.extent23 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoeses_ES
dc.publisherBABAHOYO: UTB, 2022es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/*
dc.subjectCaña de azúcares_ES
dc.subjectAlternativases_ES
dc.subjectControles_ES
dc.subjectMahanarva andigena.es_ES
dc.titleAlternativas para el control del salivazo (Mahanarva andigena), en el cultivo de caña de azúcar (Saccharum officinarum).es_ES
dc.typebachelorThesises_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador