Análisis comparativo entre las tecnologías Tesseract OCR y Abbyy FineReader, para determinar cuál ofrece la mejor eficiencia y velocidad en la digitalización masiva de documentos variados.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ruiz Parrales, Iván Rubén | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ronquillo Duche, Gerson Daniel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-14T19:53:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-14T19:53:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/15668 | |
| dc.description | This study presents a comparative analysis between two prominent optical character recognition (OCR) technologies, Tesseract OCR and Abbyy FineReader, with the objective of determining which offers the best efficiency and speed in mass digitization of various documents. A comprehensive evaluation of both technologies was conducted using a representative sample of documents including contracts, reports, forms, and other formats common in business and government environments. The main variables measured were text recognition accuracy, processing speed, and adaptability to different document formats. Standard OCR metrics were applied, such as character and word error rate, as well as the time required to digitize batches of documents. Additionally, detailed surveys and comparative analyzes were conducted to evaluate the adaptability of each technology. The results show that Abbyy FineReader significantly outperforms Tesseract OCR in terms of accuracy, processing speed, and adaptability to different document formats, making it the preferred choice for mass scanning in business and government environments. | es_ES |
| dc.description | This study presents a comparative analysis between two prominent optical character recognition (OCR) technologies, Tesseract OCR and Abbyy FineReader, with the objective of determining which offers the best efficiency and speed in mass digitization of various documents. A comprehensive evaluation of both technologies was conducted using a representative sample of documents including contracts, reports, forms, and other formats common in business and government environments. The main variables measured were text recognition accuracy, processing speed, and adaptability to different document formats. Standard OCR metrics were applied, such as character and word error rate, as well as the time required to digitize batches of documents. Additionally, detailed surveys and comparative analyzes were conducted to evaluate the adaptability of each technology. The results show that Abbyy FineReader significantly outperforms Tesseract OCR in terms of accuracy, processing speed, and adaptability to different document formats, making it the preferred choice for mass scanning in business and government environments. | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | Este estudio presenta un análisis comparativo entre dos tecnologías prominentes de reconocimiento óptico de caracteres (OCR), Tesseract OCR y Abbyy FineReader, con el objetivo de determinar cuál ofrece la mejor eficiencia y velocidad en la digitalización masiva de documentos variados. Se llevó a cabo una evaluación exhaustiva de ambas tecnologías utilizando una muestra representativa de documentos que incluyen contratos, informes, formularios y otros formatos comunes en entornos empresariales y gubernamentales. Las variables principales medidas fueron la precisión en el reconocimiento de texto, la velocidad de procesamiento y la adaptabilidad a diferentes formatos de documentos. Se aplicaron métricas estándar de OCR, como la tasa de error de caracteres y palabras, así como el tiempo necesario para digitalizar lotes de documentos. Además, se realizaron encuestas y análisis comparativos detallados para evaluar la adaptabilidad de cada tecnología. Los resultados muestran que Abbyy FineReader supera significativamente a Tesseract OCR en términos de precisión, velocidad de procesamiento y adaptabilidad a diferentes formatos de documentos, lo que lo convierte en la opción preferida para la digitalización masiva en entornos empresariales y gubernamentales. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 46 p. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | es | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Babahoyo: UTB-FAFI. 2024 | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/ | * |
| dc.subject | Tesseract OCR | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Abbyy FineReader | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Reconocimiento Óptico de Caracteres | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Digitalización de Documentos | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Eficiencia | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Velocidad | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Precisión | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Adaptabilidad | es_ES |
| dc.title | Análisis comparativo entre las tecnologías Tesseract OCR y Abbyy FineReader, para determinar cuál ofrece la mejor eficiencia y velocidad en la digitalización masiva de documentos variados. | es_ES |
| dc.type | bachelorThesis | es_ES |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador