Análisis comparativo entre los sistemas de gestión de base de datos, Cassandra y Couchbase, en términos de escalabilidad y flexibilidad de datos.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Alcoser Cantuña, Fabian Eduardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lucio Montero, Camilo Antonio | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-26T03:34:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-05-26T03:34:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/13979 | |
| dc.description | The present research focuses on performing a comparative analysis between two database management systems, Cassandra and Couchbase, to determine which of them is more scalable and flexible in terms of data management. The main objective is to evaluate the pros and cons of both systems, and to determine which one is the most suitable according to the specific needs of the project or organization. The research will include a detailed review of the architecture, features and functionalities of each system, as well as tests and experiments to evaluate their ability to scale horizontally and handle large volumes of data. The flexibility of both systems to support different types of data and data models will also be analyzed. This study will focus on comparing and contrasting the Cassandra and Couchbase database management systems in terms of scalability and data flexibility, with the objective of providing a useful guide for developers and organizations that need to select the best option for their projects or applications. However, it will seek to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each database management system in order to help users make an informed decision on which is the best option for their specific data scalability and flexibility needs. | es_ES |
| dc.description | The present research focuses on performing a comparative analysis between two database management systems, Cassandra and Couchbase, to determine which of them is more scalable and flexible in terms of data management. The main objective is to evaluate the pros and cons of both systems, and to determine which one is the most suitable according to the specific needs of the project or organization. The research will include a detailed review of the architecture, features and functionalities of each system, as well as tests and experiments to evaluate their ability to scale horizontally and handle large volumes of data. The flexibility of both systems to support different types of data and data models will also be analyzed. This study will focus on comparing and contrasting the Cassandra and Couchbase database management systems in terms of scalability and data flexibility, with the objective of providing a useful guide for developers and organizations that need to select the best option for their projects or applications. However, it will seek to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each database management system in order to help users make an informed decision on which is the best option for their specific data scalability and flexibility needs. | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | La presente investigación se centra en realizar un análisis comparativo entre dos sistemas de gestión de base de datos, Cassandra y Couchbase, para determinar cuál de ellos es más escalable y flexible en términos de manejo de datos. El objetivo principal es evaluar los pros y contras de ambos sistemas, y determinar cuál es el más adecuado según las necesidades específicas del proyecto o la organización. En la investigación se realizará una revisión detallada de la arquitectura, características y funcionalidades de cada sistema, además de la realización de pruebas y experimentos para evaluar su capacidad de escalar horizontalmente y manejar grandes volúmenes de datos. También se analizará la flexibilidad de ambos sistemas para soportar diferentes tipos de datos y modelos de datos. El presente estudio enfocará en comparar y contrastar los sistemas de gestión de base de datos Cassandra y Couchbase en términos de escalabilidad y flexibilidad de datos, con el objetivo de brindar una guía útil para los desarrolladores y organizaciones que necesitan seleccionar la mejor opción para sus proyectos o aplicaciones. Sin embargo, se buscará identificar las fortalezas y debilidades de cada sistema de gestión de bases de datos, con el fin de ayudar a los usuarios a tomar una decisión informada sobre cuál es la mejor opción para sus necesidades específicas de escalabilidad y flexibilidad de datos. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 31 p. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | es | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Babahoyo: UTB-FAFI. 2023 | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/ | * |
| dc.subject | Cassandra | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Couchbase | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Sistemas de gestión de bases de datos | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Escalabilidad | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Flexibilidad | es_ES |
| dc.title | Análisis comparativo entre los sistemas de gestión de base de datos, Cassandra y Couchbase, en términos de escalabilidad y flexibilidad de datos. | es_ES |
| dc.type | bachelorThesis | es_ES |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador