Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Estudio comparativo de las herramientas de metodologías ágiles para el aplicar buenas prácticas de desarrollo en la calidad de software.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Zúñiga Sánchez, Miguel Ángel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yánez Triana, Cinthia Karina | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-24T16:06:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-24T16:06:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/11852 | |
| dc.description | Nowadays, companies have the need to automate their processes, which choose to implement information systems in their departments, in order to be able to process efficiently and in optimal time. Poor quality software always poses risks. The causes that affect the quality of software are the result of bad practices in development. Despite the advantages offered by software development under an agile approach, there are aspects related to quality assurance that still need to be addressed. This document has been developed using a bibliographical research approach, in which the consultation in indexed internet databases, different tools of agile methodologies for development, is evidenced. In the modern software industry, delivering high quality software is the main goal for software developers. This case study provides a comparison between the most popular agile methodologies, Scrum, Extreme Programming and Kanban. There is a significant need for developers to know more about the quality of the software produced. Companies must consider that the main problem during the software development process is the change in functional specifications, followed by very optimistic planning and that the use of agile methodologies will allow them to have greater flexibility in the changes required. | es_ES |
| dc.description | Nowadays, companies have the need to automate their processes, which choose to implement information systems in their departments, in order to be able to process efficiently and in optimal time. Poor quality software always poses risks. The causes that affect the quality of software are the result of bad practices in development. Despite the advantages offered by software development under an agile approach, there are aspects related to quality assurance that still need to be addressed. This document has been developed using a bibliographical research approach, in which the consultation in indexed internet databases, different tools of agile methodologies for development, is evidenced. In the modern software industry, delivering high quality software is the main goal for software developers. This case study provides a comparison between the most popular agile methodologies, Scrum, Extreme Programming and Kanban. There is a significant need for developers to know more about the quality of the software produced. Companies must consider that the main problem during the software development process is the change in functional specifications, followed by very optimistic planning and that the use of agile methodologies will allow them to have greater flexibility in the changes required. | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | En la actualidad las empresas tienen la necesidad de automatizar sus procesos, las cuales optan por implementar sistemas de información en sus departamentos, con la finalidad de poder procesar eficientemente y en un tiempo óptimo. El software de mala calidad siempre representa riesgos. La mala calidad de software es resultado de malas prácticas en el desarrollo. A pesar de las ventajas que ofrece el desarrollo de software bajo un enfoque ágil, existen aspectos relacionados con el aseguramiento de la calidad que aún deben ser tratados. El presente documento se ha desarrollado utilizando un enfoque de investigación bibliográfico, en el cual se evidencia la consulta en bases de datos indexadas de internet, diferentes herramientas de metodologías ágiles para el desarrollo. En la industria del software moderna, la entrega de software de alta calidad es el principal objetivo para los desarrolladores de software. Este caso estudio proporciona una comparación entre las metodologías ágiles más populares, Scrum, Extreme Programan y Kanban. Existe una necesidad importante de que los desarrolladores sepan más sobre la calidad del software producido. Las empresas deben considerar que el principal problema durante el proceso de desarrollo de Software es el cambio en las especificaciones funcionales, seguido de la planificación muy optimista y que el uso de las metodologías agiles les permitirá tener una mayor flexibilidad en los cambios requeridos. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 29 p. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | es | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Babahoyo: UTB-FAFI. 2022 | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/ | * |
| dc.subject | Comparativo | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Herramientas | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Ágiles | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Calidad | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Software | es_ES |
| dc.title | Estudio comparativo de las herramientas de metodologías ágiles para el aplicar buenas prácticas de desarrollo en la calidad de software. | es_ES |
| dc.type | bachelorThesis | es_ES |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador